We all view
life through a lens. That lens is the filter which is made up of all the
experiences we have had. It is informed by our skin colour; our country; our
class; our education and our values. It just is. We view all of life through this unconscious lens.
All our biases, stereotypes and prejudices are run through the lens. Understanding the different filters on our
lenses, helps us to adjust where we need to. For me, this is the pain and joy
of being human. It is where struggle and shifts meet.
This week
the movie “Cuties” was released onto Netflix.
It is not
the first time or the last time a movie has or will create a storm. Interestingly
people of all sorts of faith persuasions or those of no faith outlook, have
been debating this particular movie. I am a Christian,, white women who lives
in South Africa. I am 51 years old. I write this all purposefully, because these parts of seemingly unimportant bits of information , are part the filter I would bring to watching a movie-
even to deciding whether I should watch a movie. Many Christians in particular
have called for the cancelling of Netflix on the back of this movie. Some have
strongly suggested Christians should not watch it. Others have gone as far as
telling ALL Christians they should not watch it. To be fair, this call comes
from a place of care and from having read some articles or commentary on the
movie. Their call is not entirely from a place of ignorance. We are free, as Christians, to decide whether to watch a movie like Cuties or not. However, having watched the movie, I can say
that the critics fall short of seeing the movie as a whole. I can focus on any
one theme in a movie and that will give it a particular flavour. Perhaps a movie might have one key theme. But in the case of Cuties,
there are multiple themes. I think the writings on this movie have failed to
explore the big themes and in particular failed to note the working-class context
of this movie. This is important when I
come to my lens idea. If I fail to note the setting, I will view this important
part of the movie through my middle-class lens. Particularly my Christian, nuclear
family (mom and dad) lens. We fail to see with clarity the reality of life for
children in places that are different from mine. We critic it through our
narrow, safe lens. We fail to see the big idea that the director was clearly trying to express. This movie is a movie that is honest, raw and rases many questions but it is also sensitive and thoughtful. It will leave a mark.
Those
who have written on it have focused on the hyper sexualization of the group f 11-year-old
teenage girls. The story is set in a French, inner city , working-class, community. The focus is
on a foreign, black, African family and their 11 year old daughter, Amy. A poignant
story which very clearly and carefully looks at life through the eyes of this
teenager, struggling to find her place in the harsh world of teenagers. She is
desperate to belong and endures bullying to make a place for herself amongst a
fairly cut throat group of 11 year old girls. The movie continues to explore the journey
through their friendship, giving snapshots of times spent together. Some of
these times are spent with the one girl friend who lives in her block of flats.
These girls get up to all sorts of girlie silliness and some clearly delinquent
behaviour. The delinquent beahviour is one of the parts I found profoundly sad and the other was the raw bullying, which was disturbing . There are moments of little
girl fun and then moments when the girl fun collides with social reality – particularly
explored through interaction with social media. The journey of the group from
dancing under a bridge to a local, fairly odd and non-event, competition is also
a part of the story but it is not the focus theme. The hyper sexualization of
these 11 year old girls is explained through the stumbling of a semi
pornographic women dance “movie” which influences their dance ‘moves’. The sexualized
movements are not sexy. They are not portrayed as sexy or desirable. They are not beautiful or intimate or
compelling in any way. They are an oxymoron and the movie is excellent in clearly
portraying this. There is an element of shame surrounding the dancing, particulalry the last dance. At no time did we think … wow. That is beautiful dancing. Not
once! And this is the point.
The focus point
of denouncing the movie, for many, has been the sexualisation of the girls in much of the
outrage I have come across. But I want to argue that this movie is not just
about this. Yes, it is about this but
not just about this. It is a careful and thoughtful movie exploring the world
of women. It is a movie exploring the world of working class people. It
explores, as I have mentioned, issues of being a foreigner ; a foreign women
with 3 young children and a husband, who we never actually meet, who is
bringing a new wife home to their small flat. It explores patriarchy and offers
her choices. While she wrestles with her pain, she is absent from her daughters
life, emotionally, and when she interacts with her , it is either in a violent outrage
or in religious ritual. Except toward the end of the movie, as she is coming to
terms with her own situation – she shows some kindness toward her daughter.
This is a
deeply moving exploration of women. There are hardly any men in the movie and
the one character that stood out for me was the spiritual man who visits the
home to see if Amy is possessed ( the only answer for her behaviour?). The movie is thus also raising questions around religion and how we view our children and interact with them, especially when things get messy. and they do for Amy.
Back to the man....this one man shows kindness.
He asks her
a question. ‘How are you?”
It was such
a touching moment for me because not once throughout this entire movie does
anyone who cares for Amy , ask her how she is. And she is clearly not ok. Amy knows
she is not ok too. Introducing the theme of a growing self-awareness and the
reality that we all have to face- that of making choices. Amy is faced with
this truth and in the end of the movie she resolves the conflict in her. The
conflict of who she is given her African culture and living in France. It is a
healthy and beautiful moment.
I worked in
London, at a school in the borough of Millwall. I worked at a school on a
council estate. I worked there for a year. My children came from working class
homes. They were good people, trying to do their best with what life had dealt
them. Some had tough circumstances. It was a tough school to work in. At times,
some of the parents would gather the drug used needles lying around the estate.
The children could easily have stumbled upon these. In this movie, the girls
find a used condom. I immediately reflected back and thought about life on council
estate in inner city London. Of course, there were used condoms lying around. Of curse kids can find them and probably do. It might not be real
life for me or my family, but it is life for many.
This is a
carefully thought through and purposefully constructed movie. It is not
beautiful but has a beuaty to it, It is not only art ,although it is in part, but it is deeply touching movie and
will stay with me for a while. I am glad I choice to watch it. It is a movie about injustice, class, struggle
and identity ( and more) and woven into this is the reality that we struggle to
find ourselves, sexually. It is a social commentary with a very specific focus
( which , I suspect , reflects more of the worlds reality, than mine) with so
much to dissect and reflect on. I found
it an excellent watch. As a teacher, parent and activist, I find myself in many
different spaces, many that do not look
like the one I am used to, I found this movie extremely helpful. I would not be bold enough or self-righteous
enough to tell anyone to watch this movie or even not to. That is for you to
decide.